Wednesday, October 24, 2012

arpl 3012_exam schedule - 25 oct 2012

below is the exam timetable*
prepare a 7 min presentation 
of your project
make it succinct + crisp
no ambulations

all are expected to be in the examroom
during everyone's presentations

name
time
handedin project 4
dayar
08.15 – 08.40
yes
leighton
08.45 – 09.10
yes
lephondo
09.15 – 09.40
no
letsoalo
09.45 – 10.10
yes
manthata
10.15 – 10.40
yes
matsebula
10.45 – 11.10
yes
mavikane
11.15 – 11.40
yes
mkhatshwa
11.45 – 12.10
yes
momberg
12.15 – 12.40
yes
mphafudi
12.45 – 13.10
yes
lunch 13.15 – 13.45
ndlovu
14.00 – 14.25
yes
peens
14.30 – 14.55
yes
sobuwa
15.00 – 15.25
yes
suleman
15.30 – 15.55
yes
wadia
16.00 – 16.25
yes
end

*schedule is subject to change

Friday, October 19, 2012

handin project 4


hand-out 04_project 4
18.9.2012 p3 states:
week 37       tue 23              hand in               project 4 complete

the dates component on p4 states:
23.10     hand in 10 am
in consultation with the greater class
this was extended to 15.00
projects handed in later than this time will not be accepted.

go through handout 04 and critically assess your document
ask if the project covers the 3 scales;
1.     metropolitan
2.     local
3.     precinct

does the project have a singular comprehensive narrative which is easy to follow?
remember that, the focus is always on the set up of a public realm as consistent + accessible network through built structure.

interrogate your document again and again, make sure it makes sense then interrogate it critically again.

goodluck

Monday, October 15, 2012

pergolas of av. icària

some people have said that
they are having difficulty accessing the
pinos example
i mentioned

here it is . . .

Pergolas of Av. Icària

http://www.google.co.za/search?q=Barcelona+ES+-+Enric+Miralles,+Carme+Pinos+-+Pergolas+of+Av.+Ic%C3%A0ria&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=FbR7UNvIBMKwhAfoqYC4Dg&biw=1126&bih=673&sei=ILR7UO-MG8fBhAfjt4GADw

Saturday, September 29, 2012

scenario livable city

http://www.boomandleisure.com/civic/plan12-architektur-biennale-koln

http://www.plan-project.com/
(for english information please scroll down)

photo: bohn & viljoen architects,  urban community gardens in cuba





inter-sections on fox


The opening of Inter-sections on Fox
 dirk bahmann + jason frenkel ]

at the GoetheonMain  on 4 October2012  18h30
The exhibition runs till the 28th October 2012

Inter-sections on fox is an exhibition that explores and documents the diverse worlds that converge on the streets of the Maboneng District.  Fox street hosts a multiplicity of users who occupy the public space of the street in a way unlike anywhere else in Jo’burg.  The rules of engagement here are ambivalent and there is therefore a constant re-negotiation of how people interact with each other.  This exhibition traces the movements of the various users from Fox street to their destinations throughout Jo’burg. It examines the emerging culture of urbanity and the intersection of worlds that is a unique phenomenon in the still highly fragmented city of Johannesburg. 
Gallery opening hours
Tuesday and Wednesday: 10:00 – 16:00
Thursday: 11:00 – 20:00
Friday and Saturday: 10:00 – 16:00
Sunday: 10:00 – 14:00
Monday: closed

GoetheonMain
245, Main St
City & Suburban
Maboneng Precinct
Johannesburg
GPS coordinates: 26°12'15.43”S & 28° 3'28.79”E

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

the VISION_component

for today's presentation
will
more than suffice
projects are good
keep up the
stimulating work

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

project 4_udf_edgecon_narrative


arpl 3012_contemporary approaches to urban design

hand-out 04_project 4
18.9.2012

in my country, we are just learning that sidewalks are relatives of parks – not passing lanes for cars.
enrique peñalosa, previous mayor of bogotá, colombia

urban design framework
in this phase of the project you will develop an urban design framework for the retail improvement district as specified in the outline of project 3. the framework will translate your vision for the area, as developed in urban sos, into an urban design proposal.
the work will be informed by and respond to
- the intense analysis of phase 1 and its findings
- the future development scenarios you ascertained in your vision
- the design principles of contextual urbanism, the interpretation of porous urban spaces and other relevant theoretical concepts

to remember:
these three principles of contextual urbanism:… have been constituting the processes from the beginning:
- it starts with a precise description of everything empirically encountered, while making no distinction between the planned and the unplanned or the physical and the non-physical.  it aims to avoid qualitative judgements.
- it endeavours to distil a story, an image and a distinguishing characteristic from what it has encountered, while treating complexity and in some cases paradox as positive qualities.
- it formulates projects from the standpoint of the continuity of the city as analysed, and implements these projects as a series or more or less mutually independent interventions, of limited scale although with an impact on the whole.[i]

to emphasise again:
the framework is not intended to cover every sqm of the entire area but asks for a strong idea for the specific identity of the district within its context and punctual interventions as points of magnitude to trigger further change for an accessible, mixed use inner city environment.  concentrate on specifics rather than generalities. the focus is always on the set up of a public realm as consistent and accessible network through built structure.  an imaginary set of spatial rules, the project code, should be customized for each framework. at this stage, the work will be concentrated on the organisation of the cross-section to complement the plan, the most important but strongly under valuated instruments of urbanism and volumetrical studies. plans and elevations considered as diagrams at this stage.

to prepare:
the framework will propose specific conditions for the development of ‘diverse and vibrant edge conditions’. the idea of urban spaces with ‘porous’ behaviour has to be interpreted and defined as a leading design principle within your design proposal.

general guidelines:
your framework needs to show your objectives for the overall area where your punctual interventions will be located. by large the objective is to create sustainable environments that enable individual creativity to thrive and contribute to community development, identity, cohesion and efficiency. this will be done through alteration of the physical environment. based on your design approach and its localities the following three levels should be revealed in your project:

i. metropolitan scale (city)
explains the location of your sites in the citywide context and makes the connection of the contribution of your design to the creation of a sustainable city.

ii. local scale (neighbourhood)
explains the location of your sites within an identifiable functional area. it shows the hierarchy of routes and distribution of public infrastructure. furthermore, it addresses the broader issues of access, circulation and open space networks.

iii. precinct area (block, street and building) – focus design
explains the distinct characteristics  of the chosen sites, which will guide the proposed design of edge conditions. it shows the nature of the proposed interventions within its immediate surroundings i.e. relationships at street level.

urban design approach
it should be guided by the vision of what needs to be achieved. re-visit your group proposal and develop it further from your own perspective. generally, the vision should be informed by a set of design principles:
-          principles for creation of vibrant, inclusive communities
-          principles of establishing economic sustainability
-          principles for creating sustainable environments

structure
the framework should consist of the following:
-          problem statement
-          objectives
-          design framework – showing all components of the concept
-          traffic flows – hierarchy of transport routes, a new design of appropriately scaled local movement network
-          key installation and infrastructure – hierarchy of nodes
-          open spaces – hierarchy, structure of open spaces, hard and soft urban landscape
-          design criteria – strategy for the urban fabric in relation to sustainability, porosity, programme, form, accessibility and legibility
-          design interventions in strategic points for development – application of the design criteria in the realities of the exiting context
-          implementation strategy

the implementation strategy should be made up of the following:
-          phasing drawings – includes economic strategy
-          three dimensional drawings of nodal areas expressing integration of your proposed design in the precinct
-          analysis and application of the design framework, positive and negative aspects. how does the framework integrate with the precinct and neighbourhood as a whole? how does it envisage economic upliftment in the area? how does it address social integration and attempt to avoid exclusionary gentrification?

to produce:
please note that the framework is not intended to be a ‘text heavy’ document but rather asking for illustrations of spatial development. make use of as many images, diagrams, plans, sections, elevations, 3d models, photo collages, axonometric views or perspectives  as you need to demonstrate your argument.

produce the following using the material from your analysis as base material:
- concept plan that shows the design approach within the wider urban context (metro scale), based on your broader context analysis from phase 1. this should be accompanied by strategic diagrams that explain your general principles in plan, section and 3d illustrations.

- concept plan for urban design approach towards the overall district.  this concept plan should point out areas where specific interventions are proposed and translate your principles into spatial layout.

- layout plan of a minimum of 3 selected sites at a scale of 1:1000, that further translate the concept into urban design. if your design proposal requires, make use of scale 1:500.

- cross sections at a scale of 1:500 and 1:200 that show the organisation of your spatial argument. the final number of sections will be determined by your design, but a minimum of 4 sections per site is expected. remember, it is important to illustrate the complexity of your design, not to tick off requirements from this list. these drawings constitute the visual representation of  your detailed design part of the project, the edge conditions.

- basic three dimensional models or axonometric drawings for each site, that illustrate the design principles in this format. again, a minimum of 1 drawing per site is expected, but your design determines the final number.

- project code: a set of imaginary spatial rules, that should be based on real by-laws and, if requires, transformed according to your principles. a valid reference for this part would be michael sorkin’s ‘local code’.

- project text: 500 – 800 words that describe the objectives of the urban design framework.


  
the evaluation of the project is broken down into three interlinked parts:
- the urban design framework as an overall product                                                 15%
- the edge conditions as design focus in selected sites                                           15%
- the visual narrative as representation of the spatial argument in drawings + text      10%


assessment
as per course outline the submissions will be marked as follows:

content                                                                                                                 40%       
idea and concept for framework and design
scales and layers covered, understanding of subject matter
originality, innovation and relevance of scenarios

techniques                                                                                                             40%       
research, method and process, variety of techniques

presentation                                                                                                           20%       
clarity and quality of the presentation
aesthetics and quality of visuals
language
completeness

dates
02.10     
presentation udf and proposal of focus areas for edge conditions
09.10     
presentation of the design of edge conditions
16.10     
presentation of revised udf, edge conditions and visual narrative
18.10     
presentation of revised udf, edge conditions and visual narrative
23.10     
hand in 10 am

sessions will be held in a presentation_feed back format. in order to prepare the final hand in form the beginning, all production is to be presented on a3 sheets. if the time is not sufficient for feedback or presentation of every student’s work, you will get brief, written comments on the blog shortly after the session, if you hand in work in a format that can be commented on (no loose sheets or sketches out of context). this part of the project requires responsible time management. all drawings must contain a title, north arrow (plans), graphic scale, key (if applicable). Follow the checklist for acceptable submissions from the course outline.

recommended format
a3 landscape or multiples hereof


the urban design framework is individual work which makes use of material produced as group work.

Any additions or amendments  to schedule and programme will be posted on the blog.




[i] WIMBY! Hoogvliet, Future, Past and Present of a New Town, 2007, NAI Publishers

Sunday, September 16, 2012

tuesday 18 sept



each is to prepare a 5min presentation
on the congress.
then the udf will be
introduced.

Monday, September 10, 2012

cities as frontier zones, s.l.u.m lab,edition 7, spring 2012


confirm sos vision submission

as published on 2.9.12, the vision has to be handed in before your trip to durban. the latest submission possibility is thursday morning, 13.9.12, directly to me or admin.

open city


the open city cannot be designed: it has to be produced via active intervention strategies. the urban designer’s instrumentarium does not consist of a clear-cut urban development plan, but of a strong vision that takes the status quo starting as the starting point, is implemented through gradual transformation, and can react to changing circumstances. the design of the implementation process is thus as important as the actual design itself. a good process improves the integration of any traces of the pre-existing context, and its characteristic properties, as a potential for identification. even the best vision will fail without a carefully thought out design process.
kees christianse,
curator of the 4th international architecture biennale rotterdam 2009: designing coextistance

comments on sos


the comments will focus on the vision pages as they indicate how to move forward and develop the udf after the sapi student congress.

walking in chris’ shoes
vision: 24h city
not sure if the title fits the intervention proposed as nothing you elaborate on is related to time. if someone of the group wants to pursue this concept, you have to map and illustrate the day and night conditions in the retail district as they are at the moment. then you have to re-programme strategic areas or points of magnitude that are strong enough to trigger and facilitate valuable change.
the project seems to be more about ‘the supportive city’ or rather ‘supporting chris’. by offering public access to water and electricity which originates from the inside and top of buildings, you start to formulate a proposal on how merge the private and public realm. this is a rather interesting idea, however it needs more layers, more precision and detail that is directly related to the site, physically (design), legally (policy) and as a narrative (chris) . use your extended fieldwork and other research to weave past and present with sustainable future  urban development. define ‘sustainable space’ through your design in a physical, environmental, cultural, economical, political and personal way. identify buildings with usable rooftops, show where the tap and power points are located in the public space. do they create a new series of public spaces running through area? calculate how many solar panels you needs, how much food you can produce. are there any other energies you can distribute publicly? how do people from the street get onto the roof top? will you design public ladders that hang on the facades? how do you handle security? what role does the new network play on a larger city scale? don’t forget to offer the owners of the building something in exchange for subletting their roofs to the street, design a win-win situation . you might need to introduce of layers of intervention in your framework. didn’t you present a sketch plan with a route that you wanted to emphasize? if so, bring it back into the project. what about the empty buildings? always remember to walk in chris’ shoes.

frontiers
vision: green linkages
you need to develop an overall idea that does not stop in the retail district, which is an urban management boundary, not necessarily a physical one. you might want to look at a proposal for urban development in basel by mawan that ‘provides an overall view on quality of public realm in the city centre for the next decades, and focuses on creating a green and vibrant landscape city, providing spaces that create a ‘shared space 2.0’.’ like the designers in that project, you visualize the development of public space, work on urban scenographies and  propose a planting concept. you have to work in section, plan and elevation simultaneously. the project needs an open space audit that catalogues all open spaces in and around the area. they can be tiny and residual or well sized and planned as such. take another look at http://www.urbantactics.org/projects/ecobox/ecobox.html, the shipping pallets grow community in paris  link the formal and the informal in your urban landscape proposal. you must go beyond a line of trees along five streets, you have to create new and unexpected linkages that change the area and its surrounding to the better. maybe include some available courtyards? think about the timeline of the project, trees need time to grow…

traversing frontiers
vision: linkages between all transport facilities
upfront a general comment: avoid to present findings as stereotypes like ‘wealthier people do not live in the rid’. your conclusion is difficult to understand as a vision guiding an urban design framework. what linkages are you looking for? how do you intend to facilitate social inclusion? what role does the potato play, what is its significance? it should be more than an indicator of links and barriers. is your project about stimulating ‘the exchange of persons, goods and knowledge’ (open city, kees christianse)? could it be declared a special economic zone where you define the rules and include small businesses like crimson and maxwan did in rotterdam in the spatial economic blok proposal, a top-down strategy that allows for bottom up transformation? using empty buildings as temporary nurturing ground for economic development? making the rid a real centre of trade? Let’s see what you’ll come up with.

Sunday, September 2, 2012

urban sos

well done to all three groups for submitting to urban sos. 
comments re: your submission and how to fine-tune your vision will be posted. as discussed in class, the hand in of the vision has been moved to teaching week 31, starting 10 sept (as per course outline), before the durban trip. exact date and time to be announced.

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

urban sos_feedback


to all groups:
- spellcheck , then re-spellcheck then spellcheck the document.
- running text in columns should always be left bound – align text left.
- text should not sit too close to images or illustrations.  min 3mm apart.
- explain your approach, the method of working, not just in a descriptive way but also elaborate on the meaning: if you base your analysis on the experiences of a group of individuals, whom do those individuals represent, whom do they stand for? how can the individual experience be used as an indicator for the life of the many.
remember the quotes from chora, raoul bunschoten in the lunch lecture:
- to see something is to exclude most other things. to frame is to focus on a particular thing, to articulate a singular condition.
- take a small sample of a city; cut a small section of its flux. watch the processes that create the flux.
- miniscenarios are written on the page of everyday life. the schematic structure of a miniscenario links processes to operational fields.
- how to tell? scenarios are narratives of urban possibilities, alternative realties, alternative practices.
- scenarios need authors, actors, agents and angels.
- identify conflicts. they are the fertile ground of any intervention.
- the conclusion is the genesis of the vision, not only a description of the method or summary of what you have done.  you have to go further, formulate a position, make a guess, take a risk and test it out. if it doesn't work, you can change in the process. ask, what if . . .



comments to the groups:

seeing the city through its people
suleman, leighton, manthata, ndlovu, mkhatshwa
p2+3: you are missing an image of the cbd as immediate context of the rid here, the leap from the regional map is too big and p3 does not show the morphology of the cbd. it is important to see the rid as a piece of the something larger, the district boundaries are administrative, not necessarily physical.
p4-18: it would be great to illustrate the networks and spaces the people are part of. you describe it in the text, but how effective could a diagram be that shows billy and his shop, linked to urban genesis through the public space in front of the shop and to mc donalds through the ablution (as an example). you could create new linkages in the next stage and set up new conditions that change situations that you consider necessary to change. 
p19-21: the history part seems to be slightly unconnected to the rest of the document. you should use a historical perspective that is relevant for your project. maybe look at it again once your vision is formulated. you might consider telling the history as well through the eyes of the people (rissik, joubert et al). what they and your protagonist have in common are, that they are all part of  ‘city making’, in different roles. can you use this for your vision? or later, udf?
p22-25: somehow linked – transport, pedestrian, market. is the rid positioned between transport nodes as destinations and people walk through the district, to get to those destinations, and on their way, they buy goods displayed on the market? the information stays a bit general and can be edited to the suit the project more specifically.
p26: ‘four of the five interviewees operate within the voids of the city’.  that is a beautiful and powerful sentence and might as well be the starting point for your vision, and later udf focus.  you would need to get into the fine grain of the voids and their morphology. how do they work, what are the rules, where are the conflicts to intervene? what can you change for what reason? who are the players, the stakeholders? can you shift responsibilities? create new alliances?
generally a good body of work, well presented, with some room for improvement. 
provisional mark analysis (worth 15% of the course mark): 67%

walking in chris’ shoes
mavikane, dayar, mphafudi, letsoalo, sobuwa
p1+2: a rather beautiful introduction that needs a bit of work at the end where you explain your method and intention. why not name the issues that chris is dealing with and make it part of your work: migration, stereotypes of foreigners, crime and different types of surveillance, affordable accommodation and (introduced later in the doc) bad buildings.
p3-5: find out more about migration, who, from where, how many? get data and illustrate it. as you say, chris is not alone, so what about the others? rather than only showing chris’ corner, produce a map with his help where he indicates good and bad places for trade in the rid, according to his understanding. maybe you find more people and can get different maps. they might differ from the urban genesis cartography…
p6+7: currently not well connected to the rest of the document. if you investigate in bad buildings (see above), you could create a new category called ‘bad open spaces’, starting with the history of the barbican and the surrounding parking lot, or the post office or any other sample of your choice.
land use page seems very general. 50% coverage – is this a rule or a reality?
p8+9: management: the layout is too busy, you need a diagram that summarizes your narrative. work with the urban politics students, they should have that information? again, identify conflicts that you can use to trigger change.
p10: public and private: you elaborate on formal and informal shoe trading in the text, is informal=illegal=public the bottom line? the sections are too generic, look more closely at thresholds and edge conditions.
p12+13: what database did you use to construct the map? again, section is too generic. specify street trading through types and space those types need. what would be the perfect size of the sidewalk incl trade? use images as material to work with, not only as illustration. use captions.
p15: illustrate your text in more specific diagrams. why do you change font size and colour here?
p16-19: affordable housing and storage: important subject to elaborate on. your presentation needs some editing and precision: types of storage/ accommodation, location, quality, costs.
p20: transport map: difficult to read
p23+24: marie and chris challenges: can this be an outline for your intervention? create traders hotspots (water, electricity, facilities)?
in your presentation you spoke about fatti’s building, an interesting case study. are there many ‘bad buildings’ in the area? or empty buildings? could you design a temporary use for them on a policy level – like: buildings are not allowed to stay empty for more then 3 months. owners have to pay an urban responsibility  fine of x amount and join ‘urban house sitting’ initiative of the city of johannesburg…?

generally a satisfying document with lots of potential to develop.
provisional mark analysis (worth 15% of the course mark): 64%

one product, four traders, infinite outcomes
wadia, momberg, peens, lephondo, matsebula
p1: summarize the meaning of the potato in the introduction. it stands for what? basic nutrition, healthy food, common object? beautiful photos, need captions.
p2: the rid is affected by a very large scale. what do you mean?
p3: is there really a 95% coverage? that differs form info from the previous group with 50% coverage? one would need to look at aerial and actually map out the morphology of the cbd.
p4: could one try to re-instate the old glory in a contemporary way, including informal trading?
p6: diagrams of the processes mentioned here would be great.
p7: again, add a diagram of the modern foodchain…summarize what is coming on the next pages in form of a b+w diagram.
p9: transportation: include taxi routes.
p10-25: very interesting material in a variety of scales. where do you go from here, where are the infinite outcomes? you might try to draw one operational diagram that covers the essence of your document and, most importantly, outlines a conflict that you can use to trigger change as an urban designer. if you aim at reconstituting eloff and pritchard to ‘symbols of prestige and quality’ (p4) and operate on a local as well as the ‘large scale’ form p2 – what do you propose to do? how would you practice inclusive urban design in this context? curious to see the development.

generally very good document that misses a conclusion.
provisional mark analysis (worth 15% of the course mark): 70%